Go Back

Technology in Practice: Where Companies Fall Short

Posted by: Robin Rusch on July 15, 2011

Last week I was the guest at a global organization in a sunny dateline city. Invited to talk about digital asset management systems, I entered a business park of 20 buildings, all humming under the same master brand.

The underground parking lot displayed a scrolling ribbon stock ticker above parked cars, reminding visitors of the immutable bond between time and money.

The elevator opened to reception where way-finder robots crouched ready to escort visitors around the sleek interiors. Presented with a temporary keycard synced to allow only my unique path, I was whisked across campus by shuttlebus, delivered at yet another checkpoint, up another elevator, cruised through corridors of nameless employees, and eventually arrived at a conference room where scheduling was timed to within a second of the day.

All as you might expect at a highly-functioning global organization, which requires absolute synchronicity to orchestrate a +4.5 billion dollar brand.

Then the meeting with corporate branding began and 21st century progress ground to a halt.

Asked about the process for brand management across the regions or business units, the brand manager stared blankly, eventually settling on a weak smile. “Well, there’s me… and in the summer, we have an intern.”

How’s that working out?


The state-of-the-art methods for communicating and exchanging files across the brand management department of this global organization involve email, dropbox, cd-roms (remember those?), and telephone.

She allowed that some of the regions were not always compliant. No kidding?!

That’s basically 1.5 people responsible for deploying a global brand and all its sub-brands across regions, business units, sponsorships, audiences, three major languages, and new acquisitions (this organization acquires companies more often than most people floss). Add the other challenges of managing a brand such as gaining sign off, approving local realizations, and educating local colleagues on execution, and I wondered how she even had time for our meeting.

Could technology help the brand communications department?

Leaving the building, I asked one of the way-finding robots. It beeped furiously, turned three times and slumped over. 




Related Posts


Harnessing the Power of Voice
Interbrand Launches Best Swiss Brands 2012
From Advertiser to Discussion Leader
When Brand Guidelines Aren't Enough

Comments  (1)


  • siobhan

    I confess I had a good chuckle at this, while simultaneously keeping my fingers crossed that this is a parable, not a true story. I find myself balking at the separation of "internal branding" with brand building as a whole, but need to remind myself that people who think in those terms are at least THINKING about it! :D Parable or not, given their heavy use of technology and lack of human engagement, perhaps they actually have a really good and consistent grasp of their brand, in which case having one person in charge of brand building (plus a summer intern) is in line with their values. Not every brand is born to win! Slapping a brand on a business is no sure way to succeed (though it certainly helps!) Thanks for the great post!


Post a comment!

  1.